A more competitive and business friendly environment is needed to ensure the UK does not lose more insurance firms based here, the ABI has warned. It comes as new figures showed insurers paid only 8.4% less corporation tax in 2008/09 than the previous tax year, against a 39% fall for the financial services sector as a whole in the same period. Despite this fall, insurance firms still pay the fourth highest corporation tax of any sector. In total, the insurance industry contributes a total of £8.2 billion to the Exchequer. The ABI also revealed that the insurance sector has an average wage of £42,000, compared to the national average wage of £25,000. This is good for the Exchequer as, on average, insurers pay £18,667 in employment taxes per employee.
The study, by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) for the ABI, found insurers paid £3.2 billion in combined business taxes in 2008 and collected a further £5 billion for the Government, making a total tax contribution of £8.2 billion. As well as its importance in tax revenues, the insurance industry employs over 313,000 people in the UK overall, with ABI members employing 175,000 people who generate employment taxes of £2.6 billion.
The figures were published as the ABI warned afresh of the competitiveness problems facing the UK. The new 50% higher rate of income tax, the reduction of pensions tax relief and the perception that higher rate payers will continue to be targeted to mend the public finances have all led to a fall in the attractiveness of the UK for senior people. Research by the ABI last year showed that 80% of insurance executives felt there would be a drop in the number of insurance firms based in the UK if the Government failed to improve competitiveness.
Peter Vipond, Director of Financial Regulation and Taxation at the ABI, said: “Today’s figures are further evidence that the insurance sector has come through the crisis in a much healthier state than the banks. This reflects the diversity and depth of the insurance industry in the UK, as well as the problems the banks have faced and emphasises the need for regulators to differentiate between the two, as they look to respond to the crisis.
“The real danger for UK plc is insurers deciding to locate away from the UK. This is not just about who offers the lowest tax rate, though that remains an important factor. Financial centres, such as the Netherlands, Ireland and Hong Kong, have emphasised their friendly attitude to business. Just as importantly they offer stability in their tax systems over the medium term. The UK cannot afford to stand still as other financial centres become more attractive.
“As well as a threat, there is also an opportunity to build on the UK’s reputation as a world leading centre for insurance and attract high quality and well paid jobs to the UK. Insurance is one of the few sectors where the UK is a world leading player, and a more competitive environment could lead to the sector growing strongly.”
Solvency II, which will change the way insurers are regulated across the EU, will make it easier for insurance companies to re-locate within Europe and the global clampdown on tax havens means insurers from non-EU jurisdictions may be looking for new homes. Earlier this month (13 January 2010), XL Capital, an insurance and reinsurance group based in the Cayman Islands announced it was moving its legal domicile from Bermuda, and chose Ireland rather than the UK as its new home.
UK insurers who have moved offshore recently include:
Company |
Headquarters location |
Date |
|
|
|
Hiscox plc |
Bermuda |
September 2006 |
Omega Insurance Holdings Ltd |
Bermuda |
September 2006 |
Kiln Ltd |
Bermuda |
March 2007 |
Hardy Underwriting Bermuda Ltd |
Bermuda |
Feb 2008 |
Beazley plc |
Ireland |
Feb 2009 |
BRIT Insurance Holdings plc |
Netherlands |
December 2009 |